Possible cure for "pink zone"--- Pistol formation?

Have the Eagles' red-zone formations become too predictable? Opposing defenses seem to be able to play off primary red-zone pass routes with technique, forcing Vick or Kolb to check it down most of the time...
This is one of those whimsical blurbs again...don't shoot the dreamweaver! I've had one foot here and the other over at PE.com's new format launch for On The Inside... I found many navigational difficulties there, but wished Dave and his crew good luck. It's a complex format with so many hidden bells and whistles it probably requires a tutorial. There were some glitches, too, as my "Bon Voyage" post took many failed atempts and error messages, finally resulting in a quadruple post. Part of the blundering was just me... but I also remember some of the programming difficulties involved with the launch of the Livefyre comments section here... So I will remain optimistic for Spadaro's eventual fine-tuning of his new platform.
Meanwhile, I was studying up on Matt Bowen's piece on red-zone routes... and I was particularly intrigued by this pattern---the Double China- 7:
Double China-7

This route is designed for a Tight End who can match up with and beat a Strong Safety. The Eagles have this one in their playbook...but for some reason their tight end (labeled "Y") rarely ends up as the ultimate target the play is designed for...since usually the play develops too slowly, and Vick or Kolb (and McNabb before them) end up checking down to a back or WR...or, in Vick's case, taking off downfield.
How it's supposed to work... vs. Cover 1, you have the TE matched up with a SS running away from the help in the middle of the field (FS). "Think of Antonio Gates, Jermichael Finley, Todd Heap, Tony Gonzalez, etc." says Bowen. "With the two underneath routes taking both the closed side CB and the Nickel back inside, the TE now has room to work and get to the back of the end zone."
I believe that both Brent Celek and Clay Harbor have the ability to beat a good safety on this design. But I got to thinking, maybe what's missing is a little more deception in the Eagles' formation starting point in red-zone routes like the one above.
Brent Celek, TE. 6-4, 255
Clay Harbor, TE, 6-3, 250
In Detroit, what they do is use Brandon Pettigrew out of the same Double China-7 formation above... but help him out with a variation of the route known as "The Pistol"...
It adds deception...optional variations to run the route...pre-snap shifts...now nobody on the defensive side of the ball is really sure where the Tight End is going...or when. The Lions have used "The Pistol" to some advantage in improving their own red zone results.
In "The Pistol", the QB is in a shorter set than standard shotgun formation, with the TailBack (marked "W") lined up directly behind him...
Using the Double China-7 route tree from the Pistol, you'd have Jeremy Maclin at "X" and Brent Celek or Clay Harbor at "Y"... and the threat of increased run options from the Pistol with the running back or fullback ("R") and tailback ("W") both starting out in the backfield...
Now the defense has to overplay Maclin on the fade. Now they have to play Celek straight up on the stick nod. Now the QB can look for the best one-on-one matchup with a linebacker in the flat if Celek can't beat his coverage.
It opens things up for the run off tackle by the "Pistol"-back, too.
Most of all, I like the idea of the "Pistol" giving Celek or Harbor a lot more room to work with...as well as increased confusion caused to the defensive secondary in coverage. The "Pistol" may not have much impact against a "Cover 3"... but I wouldn't mind seeing it used more against Cover 1 or 2 in the Birds' "pink zone"...






